Charles Fox was Chief Constable of Muswellbrook when he took his own life on Monday 25 August, 1856. The following paragraph appeared in the Sydney Morning Herald of 29 August, 1856.
On Monday, the 25th, an enquiry was held at the courthouse, Muswellbrook, before the coroner, Mr J.B.West, and a jury of twelve, touching on the death of Mr Charles Fox, chief constable, who, on the same morning, had committed suicide, by shooting himself with a pistol. It appeared on evidence that the deceased was latterly under medical treatment for general debility and depression of the mental faculties and had been for some time past labouring under hypochondria. It seemed on a view of the body, which presented a shocking spectacle that he had placed the muzzle of the weapon in his mouth, which dreadfully shattered… A finding of ‘Destroyed himself while labouring under temporary insanity’ was accordingly made. The deceased was much respected as a steady inoffensive man, and has left a widow and one son.
At the time of his death the chief constable was stationed at Muswellbrook.
Chief Constable George WOOD
| 23/10/2012
Chief Constable George WOOD
New South Wales Police
Illness/Exposure
East Maitland
6 January, 1855
The death of the chief constable followed a boating incident during a search for a body, and was described by the Maitland Mercury and Hunter River General Advertiser of10 January 1855.
DEATH OF MR. GEORGE WOOD – Many of our distant readers will learn with great regret that the well-known chief constable of Maitland, Mr. George Wood, is dead. Few officers holding such a position have more deservedly merited the universal sorrow his death has caused in Maitland. Uniting cool and determined courage with the greatest gentleness, vigour and promptness with the kindest forbearance, Mr. Wood was in the highest sense of the word a peace officer, and to his exertions and example it has been greatly owing that this district has been so quiet and well-ordered for many years past. His long and well-tried services may be said to have been fitly closed by a death resulting in part from the performance of duty. After a recent fatal accident by drowning, Mr. Wood was as usual one of the most persevering in his efforts to find the body; and while so engaged the boat he was in was upset, he got entangled among the lines and ropes in use, and being unable to swim, he was quite exhausted before he could be got out of the water. For two or three years past his frame had shown signs of increased suffering under the effect of old wounds and injuries, and the shock he now received threw him on a sick bed, and brought on an attack of old disease, from which he appeared likely at first to recover, but a relapse occurring, he died on Saturday morning last. His funeral on Sunday was attended by a great number of persons, twenty carriages, above fifty gigs, a hundred and fifty horsemen, and many persons on foot, following his remains to the grave.
At the time of his death the constable was aged 52 years and was chief constable at Maitland Police Station. He left a wife and seven children.
Nick WilesI’m putting together the map of police graves and I’ve come across the Grave of Chief Constable Woods. It looks that the current state of this grave is deplorable. The grave is in the East Maitland Anglican Cemetery (aka Glebe Burial Ground) off George Street in East Maitland. It’s such a shame that a man who was held in such esteem he had “twenty carriages, above fifty gigs, a hundred and fifty horsemen, and many persons on foot” at his funeral and his grave is no longer remembered or tendered to.
Grave Location: positioned right hand side upon the entry gate
Robert Lovell McDOUGALL gravestone
ROBERT IS mentioned on the Police Wall of Remembrance
It appears that Corporal McDougall met his death in 1853 when returning to Sofala from Wattle Flat, where he had been inspecting gold licences and executing a warrant with another policeman possibly named Johnson. McDougall and Johnson had each then set out for Sofala via different routes, for some reason. As McDougall rode along the road over Whalan’s Hill his horse took fright going down a steep incline and he was thrown. It would appear that one of his feet became caught in a stirrup and he was dragged along, inflicting fatal injuries. When his riderless horse returned to town late that night a search was immediately launched and the unfortunate corporal was found about 2am. He died shortly after being taken home. He left a widow, Mary Ann McDougall and five children. His headstone at Sofala reads”McDougall” however most documents located so far indicate that the correct spelling is probably “MacDougall“.
The Sydney Morning Herald of Wednesday 5 October, 1853, p3, carried the following account of the incident.
A melancholy accident, which terminated fatally occurred last week to Corporal MacDougall of the mounted police. It appears that the deceased was returning from the new diggings on Thursday evening when about half a mile from Sofala his horse stumbled and fell, probably on the top of him. The fall unseated him, but unfortunately one of’ his feet got entangled in the stirrup, and he must have been dragged a considerable distance on the road, as his body was in a very mutilated condition. The horse arriving in town late at night without the rider, a search was at once instituted, but it was not until two o’clock on Friday morning that he was found on the side of a hill, half a mile from Sofala in a state of insensibility. Deceased was at once removed to Sofala, and medical assistance procured, but the injuries he received were of so severe a nature that he expired on Friday evening. A magisterial enquiry was held by Mr Commissioner Johnson, when a verdict of accidental death was returned. He was a most efficient officer of the police, and the respect in which he was held by the inhabitants of Sofala was fully testified by the large concourse of all classes and denominations which last Sunday followed his remains to their last resting place. He was in the 27th year of his age, and has left a wife and five children.”
A report submitted on 26 September, 1853 by Assistant Gold Commissioner Johnson of Bathurst, sheds a little more light on Corporal McDougall, as follows.
AGC Office Sofala 26th Sept/53. No. 53/112.
Sir,
I regret to have to report to you the death of Crpl Robt MacDougall of the Gold Police of this State who died on the 23rd instant from the effects of a fall which he received from his horse on returning from executing a warrant on the 22nd instant.
1. No-one witnessed the occurrence but from the evidence given by persons who were with MacDougall immediately prior to it he appears to have been perfectly sober and that the horse he was riding was very restive.
2. The deceased had been in the Police at Sofala for nearly two years during which period he bore the character of a steady, sober and efficient policeman having never been brought up for any misconduct whatever.
3rd. He has left a wife and five children the youngest being only just born and who by this sudden bereavement are left almost destitute. I would therefore urge whether taking into considerations the good character and efficient service of the deceased a gratuity, or pension may not be bestowed upon his widow.
Signed W Johnson AGC
The Gold Commissioner
Western Districts
Bathurst
The corporal was born in 1816 and enlisted in the Gold Escort on 1 October, 1851. At the time of his death he was stationed at Sofala.
Robert Lovell McDougall (son of Samuel McDougall and Margaret McCormack) was born 1816 in Coleraine Londonderry Ireland, and died 1853 in Sofala NSW Australia.He married Mary Ann Saul.
More About Robert Lovell McDougall:
Burial: 1853, Sofala NSW Australia.
Children of Robert Lovell McDougall and Mary Ann Saul are:
+Mary McDougall, b. 1844, Bermuda West Indies, d. date unknown.
National Police Wall of Remembrance touch plate inscription: – differs slightly on date of joining, his rank and station but especially the date of death.
Trooper Robert Lovell McDOUGALL
Sofala NSW
29 September 1853
Jurisdiction: New South Wales
Year of Birth: 1816
I have found the headstone of Corporal Robert Lovell MACDOUGALL has broken in half & the inscription has almost been weathered away. He was buried at Sofala C of E cemetery in 1853, positioned right hand side upon the entry gate.
His widow Mary Ann remarried to another Trooper, Owen Valentine PARSLEY, her Headstone is to be found beside that of Corporal MacDougall. Robert was born in Coleraine, Londonderry, Ireland. 1816
He married Mary Ann (Marion) SAUL, their first child Mary was born in Bermuda.
Two sons were then born in Donegal, Ireland. On arrival in Sydney a daughter Jane Leslie was born, their last child Margaret was born in Sofala a few months before Robert’s death on 26th September, 1853.
Thanking you in anticipation
Janet Aubrey
Married Eliza Santer (d: 4 Jan 1869 in Mudgee) on 4 June, 1829 in Benenden, England,
Father of Albert, Mary A., Own, Rachael, Jane E. Arnold & William I. Oxley
Appointed Constable at Mudgee in 1851
49 old
19 May, 1853
Gravestone in Mudgee Pioneer Park
On the evening of 29 April, 1853 Maurice Dalton, a former publican, attempted to gain entry to Freeman’s Public House in Mudgee. After being refused entry by the owner Freeman, Dalton threw a large stone into the building. He then crossed the street where he came upon a man named Brandon who was playing a clarinet. Dalton knocked Brandon to the ground, asking him what business he had playing the instrument. Brandon then went and reported the incident to Constable Oxley. A short time later Oxley located Dalton and asked him, “Is that you, Maurice Dalton?” Dalton replied, “Who are you?” and then went on, “Oh, I know you for a b—– trap by your buckle.” He then struck Oxley a severe blow to the side of his head with a large stick, knocking the constable to the ground. He then kicked the fallen constable as he lay on the ground.
The Maitland Mercury and Hunter River General Adviser of Wednesday 8 March, 1854 informed the community that “Oxley lived for 19 days after, and even performed duties at times, but at length died from apoplexy induced by the wound, the brain being greatly inflamed under the wound. The jury returned a verdict of manslaughter, and prisoner was remanded for sentence.”
The constable joined the police force in June, 1851. At the time of his death he was 49 years old and was stationed at Mudgee.
SERIOUS CHARGE AGAINST A PUBLICAN.- In the month of April ultimo, Maurice Dalton, a publican at the Maitland Bar, on the Turon, was committed for trial by the Mudgee Bench of Magistrates for assaulting a policeman named Oxley. Mr. Dalton was admitted to bail, but as the case assumed a serious aspect, and Oxley has died, Mr. Dalton’s sureties surrendered him to the Gold Police, from whom he effected his escape, and is still at large.-Empire, May 30.
Empire ( Sydney ) Friday 6 January 1854 page 5 of 8
MURDER. – A man named Maurice Dalton was placed in the dock by Sergeant McGhee, charged with having committed a violent assault on Constable Oxley, of the Mudgee Police, from the effects of which the constable had subsequently died. The offence was committed in the month of April last, near Bathurst, and prisoner was apprehended on a warrant from the Mudgee Bench, which had since been sent to Port Phillip, where it was supposed he was residing. The prisoner denied the charge laid against him. At the request of Mr. Wearin, he was remanded till this morning.
Empire ( Sydney ) Saturday 7 January 1854 page 3 of 8
MURDER AT MUDGEE. — Maurice Dalton was again placed before the Court. A witness named Hugh O’Donnell deposed, that he lived some time since at Mudgee, and knew a person named Maurice Dalton ; witness did not believe the prisoner was the same man ; if so, he had very materially altered in appearance. Sergeant McGhee produced the Hue and Cry, wherein, under date 28th April, 1853, was given the description of a man named Dalton, charged with a violent assault on Constable Oxley, from the effects of which the latter afterwards died. The description published corresponded exactly with the personelle of prisoner. A letter was found on the defendant, having reference to the alleged assault. Their Worships, after consultation, remanded prisoner to the Mudgee Bench for examination.
The Sydney Morning Herald Monday 13 February 1854 page 5 of 8
On Friday the 27th ultimo, Maurice Dalton, who had been apprehended in Sydney for the murder of William Oxley, one of our constables, in May last, was brought into our township and safely lodged in the lockup.
The Sydney Morning Herald Thursday 16 February 1854 page 3 of 8
MAURICE DALTON — This somewhat notorious individual was forwarded from Bathurst to Mudgee about a fortnight ago, to be present at the investigation touching the death of the policeman who fell by his hands, at the last Mudgee races. He was fully committed to take his trial at the forthcoming assizes for an assault resulting in the death of the attacked, and reached Bathurst on Monday last.
Empire ( Sydney ) Saturday 4 March 1854 page 3 of 8
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1854.
MURDER.
Maurice Dalton was indicted for that he, on the 29th April 1853, at Mudgee, in New South Wales, did feloniously, wilfully, and of his malice aforethought, kill and murder one William Oxley.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL stated the facts of the case, and called
James Lucas Brandon: I live at Mudgee ; I lived there in April last ; I saw the prisoner on 28th April ; he insulted me, and knocked me down ; I was going home, playing the clarionet, when the prisoner came across and asked me what business I had playing that bloody thing, and knocked me down ; I went to constable Oxley, and told him, and he told me to go home ; when I got home I heard stones thrown against my hut ; I was frightened to stop, and I went out for constable Oxley, and then I saw the prisoner : Oxley spoke to prisoner, and asked what he was about, kicking up that row at that time of the night for ; prisoner asked him who he was, and said, I know you are a b—dy trap, I know you by your buckle ; I then saw Oxley fall, no one was near him when he fell but prisoner ; I was 100 yards off ; I could not say whether prisoner had a stick or a stone in his hand ; when Oxley fell I went up to him, and found him bleeding profusely from a cut on the head, he was not able to speak, he appeared to be insensible ; I think Oxley lived for a month afterwards.
Cross-examined by Mr. Holroyd : After he was knocked down, and before his death I often saw him on duty in the streets of Mudgee ; I had been playing the clarionet in Tuckerman’s public house, in Mudgee. I drunk nothing that day but peppermint and ginger beer – three glasses of port wine in the evening.
William Freeman : I live in Mudgee ; I recollect 28th April, 1853 ; I recollect seeing prisoner that night ; he used to keep a public house at Maitland Bar ; on that night I was called up by the mistress, who said some one was breaking into the house ; I went outside and found prisoner there ; I told him to go away, but he would not go away ; I then went back to my house and he followed me round and threw a large stone into my house, which fell on my wife and child ; I spoke to him, about throwing the stone, and he then went away ; I saw him then walk towards the witness Brandon, who was coming down the street, and I saw them scuffling, and Brandon called out for Oxley ; I afterwards saw Oxley bleeding about the head, about half an hour after I saw prisoner scuffling with Brandon.
Cross examined by Mr. HOLROYD; He had no stick in his hand after he threw it on my wife’s bed.
Donald McDonald ; I am a surgeon, I knew the late William Oxley ; I was called to see him in the morning of 29th April, 1853 ; he was lying on his bed, bleeding-profusely from a cut on his head, it was a contused wound such as might have been caused by a stone ; he lived eighteen or nineteen days after I first saw him ; I made a post mortem examination ; I should say that his death was caused by the injury received on his head ; I knew deceased for several years, he was a healthy man ; the scalp was inflammed, and on opening the cranium I found the membranes of the brain were inflammed, caused by the wounds ; other causes might have accelerated his death.
Cross-examined by Mr. HOLROYD : I think the wounds were sufficient to cause death ; I believe deceased was a free liver, and had the appearance of a man that drank ; I saw deceased do duty as a constable ; I cautioned him not to drink ; I believe but apoplexy was caused by the blows on the head.
David Picton: I live at Mudgee ; I recollect the night Oxley was wounded ; I saw a man near Brandon’s, house ; whilst I was in Brandon’s house two stones were thrown in ; Brandon then went to Oxley for assistance ; Oxley went up to the man and said, “Is that you, Maurice Dalton?”. Prisoner said, “Who are you?” and then said “0, I know you are a bl–dy trap, by your buckle” and struck him a blow with a large stone. Oxley fell when he got the blow ; I helped Brandon to pick him up.
Cross-examined by, Mr. HOLROYD : I was 20 yards off Oxley when the blow was struck. .
Mr. Bailey, Clerk of Petty Sessions, Mudgee:
I knew William Oxley, the constable ; I know he is dead ; Oxley was examined before the Bench on the 30th April, 1835 ; the magistrates present were M. P. Bayley, and Basil Dickenson. ( Deposition put in and read. )
Mr. HOLROYD addressed the jury for the defence, and contended that the death was caused by other causes, and called the following witnesses in support of such a view of the case :-
John Ashton : I am a constable in Mudgee ; I knew the deceased, I recollect his meeting with this injury ; I know that he had fits ; he had one on 26th February last year between the time of the accident and his death ; he went on duly 12 miles from Mudgee ; he went on horseback ; this was about 15 or 16 days after he received the injury.
Cross-examined by the ATTORNEY-GENERAL :
The first time I saw him in a fit was on 26th February last year ; I don’t know what caused the fit ; I never saw him have another fit ; he appeared a very healthy man.
George Taylor ; I am an innkeeper at Mudgee ; I knew Oxley the deceased ; I recollect his taking a journey to Cloudy Bay ; after his return from Cloudy Bay, I saw him in a fit ; this was in the morning ; I saw deceased lying in a fit on the ground ; I assisted him by lo??ing his handkerchief, and then went for the doctor ; he was very apoplectic looking ; I saw him occasionally on duty from the time of the assault to his death.
Cross examined by the ATTORNEY-GENERAL : He went to Cloudy Bay some days after he got the wound ; it was not quite healed.
Alexander-Watt : I knew the prisoner whilst he was in my employment ; he was a very well behaved man.
Cross-examined, by the ATTORNEY-GENERAL ; It is ten or twelve years since he was in my service ; he was a few weeks in my service employed mowing.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL replied at some length.
After an address of some length from the Judge and a careful recapitulation of the evidence by him, the Jury returned their verdict of
Bathurst Free Press and Mining Journal ( NSW ) Saturday 4 March 1854 page 3 of 6
WILFUL MURDER Maurice Dalton was indicted for the wilful murder of William Oxley on the 29th April last, at Mudgee. He pleaded not guilty and was defended by Mr. Holroyd. Attorney — Mr. Serjeant.
James Lucas Brandon deposed that about 1 o’clock of the morning of the 29th. April, he was proceeding homeward, playing a clarinet, when the prisoner walked up to him and after asking him what he wanted playing that b____y thing, knocked him down. He applied to constable Oxley for assistance who advised him to go home. He did so, and shortly afterwards stones were thrown at his door and upon the house. Again he went for Oxley for assistance who came out, and no sooner made his appearance than the prisoner accosted him in these words— “you’re a B____y trap, I know you by your buckle.” Upon proceeding to the spot he found deceased lying senseless and bleeding, the wound having been inflicted on the side of the head. Cross-examined by Mr. Holroyd. He frequently saw the deceased upon duty afterwards in Mudgee— never saw him the worse for liquor, but recollected taking a glass with him on the Thursday before his death.
William Freeman saw the prisoner at Mr. Arthur Cox’s on the 29th April last, who was making a great noise. He ordered him away and was requested by him not to tear his shirt. In a moment afterwards prisoner seized a big bludgeon which he threw inside upon the bed in which his wife and children were sleeping. At this time the prisoner had a stone in his hand. He saw the deceased who was capable of walking unsupported.
Dr. Macdonald attended the deceased who had a wound upon the side of the head, which did not appear to he dangerous. Besides this he subsequently discovered, when holding a post mortem examination upon his body, another and more serious wound at the back part of the head, but from which no external injury appeared. He had no doubt but the blow’s accelerated, if they did not cause his death. There was a considerable effusion of blood upon the brain. Cross-examined by Mr. Holroyd : He did not know that the deceased drank, but he had the appearance of a free- liver. He saw deceased a few days before his death and heard of his falling over a scraper. From that period he had a succession of apoplectic fits which continued until death.
David Picton saw a man whom he did not know to be the prisoner near Brandon’s, at whose house he threw two stones. Shortly afterwards he saw Oxley leave his house and heard him speak to this man whom he named Dalton, and who in reply called him “b___y trap” ‘ A moment or two afterwards he saw Dalton strike deceased with a thick stick which felled him to the earth : blood flowed freely from the wound thus caused. He (witness) might be 20 yards from them at the time Brandon and he stood near each other.
Mr. F. Bailey proved that a charge for a violent assault was preferred against Dalton who was committed to take his trial at the Quarter Sessions on the 30th. January. Some time afterwards Oxley died and an inquiry was held upon his remains. The depositions were written by him as Clerk of the Court at Mudgee.
This evidence closed the case for the Crown. Mr. Holroyd addressed the jury in behalf of the prisoner. This case, he said, involved a charge of murder without malice, as from the evidence which had been given it was impossible to conceive that the prisoner could have been actuated by any such feeling. There was nothing before the jury to show that they were even acquainted, and from the nature of the wounds the blows must have been of a very trivial character. When the witness Freeman reached deceased he was standing upon his legs, and could not therefore have been very seriously wounded. There was moreover a discrepancy in the testimony of Picton and Brandon which showed plainly that both could not speak truth. The former estimated the distance at which they stood at the time the deceased fell at 100 yards, whilst the latter fixed it at about 20. Clearly this was no case of murder, and he could not for one moment imagine how it was to be reduced even to manslaughter upon such trumpery evidence. According to Dr. Macdonald’s testimony the deceased had a predisposition towards apoplexy, and this predisposition was increased by ardent spirits of which it appeared probable he partook. It would also be fresh in the recollection of the jury that the deceased had fallen against a scraper a few days before his death, and had then most probably received the injury at the back of the head which caused apoplexy and hastened his death. To his mind it appeared that an assault was the worst charge that could be fixed upon the prisoner.
He then called Constable Ashton of Mudgee who knew the deceased and remembered that on the 26th. February 1853 he had a fit about 7 miles from Mudgee, and was insensible for about three quarters of an hour, but had never seen him in one before nor since. Witness attributed his illness on that occasion to the fact that they had been travelling all day with a flock of sheep, and deceased had not broken his fast. About 16 days after the assault deceased was on duty and went with a letter for the coroner to Cloudy Bay, and did not return until the following day.
Mr. George Taylor, Innkeeper of Mudgee, remembered deceased’s going to Cloudy Bay in the early part of May in last year ; it was after the assault — had never seen him in a fit until he returned from Cloudy Bay. On the morning after his return, heard some one screaming, and on going out saw deceased on the ground in a fit – knew that he had been on duty occasionally after the 29th. of April. Cross- examined, by the Attorney-General : The wound in the head was not quite healed at the time he went to Cloudy Bay and witness thought he was not able to do as much duty as before the assault. He did not appear to suffer from any other cause than the wound in the head.
Mr. Alexander Watt was called to give the prisoner a character. He said he had known him for ten or twelve years, and on one occasion had employed him during the harvest — had also heard other persons speak of him, and believed that when sober, he was quiet and well behaved, but when in liquor very violent. Beyond this he did not know very much about him.
The Attorney-General replied and made some stringent remarks about gentlemen appearing to give prisoners a good character of whom they know but little, the natural consequence of which was that the cases of those who really deserved a good character were materially injured. In reference to the case before the court he cited some cases to show that it was a matter of no importance whether the deceased was aged and infirm, or young and strong, but if his death was accelerated by the conduct of the prisoner the charge against him was sustained. He also directed the attention of the jury to the expression used by the prisoner at the time of the assault calling deceased a “B___y trap” &c., kicking him after he had knocked him down, and said if deceased had drunk too much or taken too much exercise after the assault it would not make an atom of difference ; for Dr. McDonald had declared that death had resulted from the effects of the blows upon the head. His Honor, in summing up, laid before they jury very clearly and distinctly the difference between murder and manslaughter, and said that in cases of homicide the law presumed the existence of malice ; and it was for the defendant to show that he had just cause for his conduct in the affair. After reiterating the evidence he left the case in the hands of the jury. The jury found a verdict of manslaughter. Prisoner who was remanded for sentence.
The Sydney Morning Herald Wednesday 8 March 1854 page 5 of 8
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND THE MAGISTRACY.
(From Saturday’s Bathurst Free Press.)
In opening the case against Maurice Dalton, for the wilful murder of Constable Oxley, at Mudgee, the learned Attorney-General prefaced his review of its leading features by the following observations upon the general recklessness which prevails with regard to the issue of licences : –
This, he said, was one of the many instances which had recently come under his notice of individuals being intrusted with a publican’s license who were most palpably and flagrantly unfitted for such a position. Here was a man arraigned for the wilful murder of a fellow creature – a murder committed whilst in a state of maddening intoxication, who by some means or other had obtained a license as a publican. And how came this? Would it not be quite as safe, nay infinitely more so, to place deadly weapons in the hands of a maniac and turn him loose upon society, than to intrust a person of bad moral character, and a notorious drunkard to boot, with the power and opportunity of inflicting such a vast amount of mischief upon the community. Only that very day it had transpired in evidence upon another case that the prisoner had been a publican at Carcoar, and was known to the bench to be an habitual drunkard. Nay, one of the magistrates himself who appeared as a witness had admitted that when he called to see him about the money which he was accused of stealing, he was so drunk as to be unable to speak sensibly and that he never saw him sober ; yet, notwithstanding these facts, known personally to himself, and occurring under the very nose of the Bench, his license was subsequently renewed. What security, he would ask, could there be for the preservation of public order and against the commission of crime whilst magistrates thus culpably neglected their duty? One bad man invested with the privileges and opportunities of evil which appertained to such a calling, could accomplish a vast amount of mischief in promoting and fostering vice and crime, and in aiding in the demoralization of those by whom he was sure to be surrounded. It would be better to arm a madman with a firebrand and trust to consequences, than enable a person so devoid of character and principle to scatter about him the moral poison of his depraved nature. The frequency of late of such cases as those upon which he was now commenting impelled him thus publicly to call attention to the circumstance. And he must say if magistrates tolerated such evils by neglect of duty, they were responsible for the consequences.
Such was the emphatic language employed by one of the highest legal authorities of the country under circumstances which demanded a strong expression of opinion ; and it is a fortunate thing for the colony that the position is filled by a gentleman who, regardless of personal considerations, has the moral courage to administer a castigation so well merited. We agree with him, that to place such men as Henrys and Dalton in the situation of a licensed publican is to laugh at the law and treat public order and decency with contempt. A ruffian and debauchee are not to be placed in situations where duly imperatively requires an unremitting self-control, and in which temptation is continually beckoning the most discreet from the path of rectitude with seductive arts and fascinating smiles. There is too little care taken in investigating the characters of applicants for licenses, and the consequence is witnessed in the fact that whilst the great majority of licensed publicans are men of good repute and undoubted integrity, many, very many, have crept into the trade who would do little credit to any calling or position of life in which they might be found,
And herein principally lies the misfortune. Similarity of tastes and disposition surrounds such men with the criminal and the vile. At such houses their depredations are planned, and there the wages of crime are dissipated. Money thus easily earned is recklessly squandered, and heedless of the source whence it has been procured, if not directly concerned in the plans of his rascally associates, the unprincipled tapster grows fat upon the spoils which have been wrung from the honest and unwary. There sins and malpractices are, therefore, not only connived at, but encouraged. They form a perennial spring of profit whose amount is not to be despised. True to one instinct of our natures, where better sentiments are inoperative, he sells his grog, pockets their ill-earned cash, and ask no questions. To him the clever and successful thief is worth infinitely more as a customer than twenty honest and reputable men, and hence such company is infinitely preferred. The wealth of a plundered community flows into his pockets, and for this consideration he is ready to administer in any shape to the base ( and brutal passions of his customers.
The above may be an extreme case, but there are many which differ only in degree. Men of loose or unfixed principles are not apt to be over-scrupulous where business is to be done. The tap runs freely whilst the cash is responsive, and under such circumstances little heed is taken of irregularities, improprieties, or the Licensed Victualler’s Act. The free and easy style of such establishments suits the tastes of the reckless and the profligate ; and hence it ¡s that the respectable publican, whose regard for his own character and the reputation of his house will not permit any gross violation of law or decency, is most materially injured.
But we are very far from imagining that the rapid strides by which intemperance is stalking over the country are to be stayed by the most active magisterial superintendence. The root of the evil lies out of the reach of all law – beyond the grasp of the most vigilant police. To read lectures to the magistracy will do little towards the correction of an evil which has eaten its way into the very vitals of our social system, and overshadows the land with gloom. All the powers of legislation and machinery of our courts of justice are unequal to the task of eradication. Society must expurgate itself, and it can only do so by the universal action of some powerful moral agency. No class is free from the taint of this cankering vice, and sermons upon temperance delivered to the masses will be of little force or efficacy whilst the power of example is wanting in the ranks of those who claim the right to sermonize.
It is true that much crime and irregularity might be prevented by a stricter exercise of the discretionary power vested in the magistracy, but the public may fairly share the blame of recklessly licencing all applicants. No matter what the character, five respectable householders will be found to parade their names in the way of recommendation, and it is notorious that profit has often more to do than principle with the matter. In this manner men of indifferent or bad repute have passed through the magisterial ordeal into a public-house, and have thus visited one of the sins of the community upon its own head. First – Mr. So and so, storekeeper, signs, because he is anxious to secure a customer, and uses his influence with a friend or two. Several good names being already attached, they become a guarantee of the applicant’s eligibility for a license. Others are therefore easily obtained, and the bench by no means unwilling to forego the trouble of an inquiry which promises more kicks than half-pence, take it for granted that the applicant is what he is represented to be. The learned Attorney-General could therefore have very well afforded to give his castigation a much wider amplitude.
The Sydney Morning Herald Wednesday 15 March 1854 page 3 of 12
Maurice Dalton, manslaughter, was sentenced to five years hard labour on the roads or other public works, the two first to be worked in irons. He presented a petition to his Honor setting forth amongst other things that his victim had died from the effects of falling upon the scraper, but this his Honor stated to be impossible, the wound behind the head was caused by a blunt not a sharp instrument, a fact which was established by the circumstance that the skin was not cut outside. His conduct he said had been most savage and unprovoked and he would mark it by very severe sentence.
Grave location is: Mudgee Memorial Park
NOTE: 1 June 2014:
It has been revealed that this person is NOT mentioned in the States Honour Roll nor the National Honour Roll of Fallen Police.
The following message has been sent, this date, to the NSW Facilitator for this to be remedied:
G’day Andy
It has come to my notice that Constable William OXLEY, killed as a result of work related assault, who died on the 19 May 1853, is NOT mentioned in the National, nor NSW Honour Roll.
See my website: https://police.freom.com/william-oxley/
I have listed all the relevant newspaper articles of the time, in relation to the matter and it is shown that the offender ( Maurice Dalton ) was finally convicted of the Manslaughter of Constable William OXLEY who is buried at the Mudgee Pioneer Park.
Service: From 16 November 1852 to 4 May 1853 = 6 months
Awards:
Born: ? ? 1819
Died on: 4 May 1853
Cause: Illness – severe cold – Exposure
Age: 33
Funeral date:
Funeral location:
Grave location: Constable TWISS was interred at the Camperdown Cemetery but his grave is unmarked and location unknown.
[alert_red]ALEXANDER is NOT mentioned on the Police Wall of Remembrance[/alert_red] * BUT SHOULD BE
Constable Alexander Twiss served in the Sydney Police Force from 16 November 1852 until his death on 4 May 1853. His cause of death is recorded as having been ” from the effects of a severe cold caught when on escort duty at night “ .No further details are known as yet.
The constable joined the police force on 16 November, 1852. At the time of his death he was 34 years old and was attached to the Sydney Police. He left a widow named Sarah.
[divider_dotted]
John WATSON
| 23/10/2012
John WATSON
New South Wales Police Force
Regd. # ????
Rank: Constable
Stations: ?, City Police ( Sydney )
Service: From? ? ?to 25 October 1852 = ? years of Service
Awards: ?
Born: ? ? ? about 1827, Downpatrick, Co. Down, Ireland.
Event date: Saturday 14 February 1852
Event location: outside of the Horse and Jockey Hotel, Hunter St, O’Connell St, Sydney @ 9pm
Event type: Assault – kicking
Died on: Monday 25 October 1852
Place of death: ?
Cause: Illness – Tuberculosis
Age: 26
Funeral date: Wednesday 27 October 1852
Funeral location: ?
Buried at: St John’s Anglican Cemetery, Menangle Rd, Camden
Grave location: very end of Row E, Plot 107
Memorial at:
Inscription: In Memory Of John WATSON who died 25th Oct 1852. Aged 26. At Rest ??????
JOHN is NOT mentioned on the Police Wall of Remembrance
* BUT should be
Sergeant John Watson was born c1827, Downpatrick, Co. Down, Ireland.
He, along with his wife Susan Watson (nee Gillespie) 1830-1912, arrived in Sydney 15/10/1851 aboard the “Earl Grey”. During the voyage his wife gave birth to a son John Watson, 1851-1918. Sergeant Watson died 1 year and 10 days after arriving in Sydney.
He is buried in the St. Johns Anglican Church cemetery, Camden, NSW.
Buried at the very end of Row E, plot 107.
♥ Kevin Bannister 041120
Sergeant Watson is thought to have died on 25 October, 1852 as a result of the onset of tuberculosis following an assault by a prisoner he was escorting to a police station.
He was buried at Camden on 27 October, 1852 at which time his residence was recorded as Sydney.
Few details are yet known of the incident, however the Sydney Morning Herald of 24 May, 1860 when reporting on the death of Inspector Alexander McGee, included the following clue.
We are happy to say that we have been informed by the superintendent of Police that a pension to the widow [of McGee] of ” £50 can be afforded out of the Police Fund. It is a somewhat singular coincidence that this will be the second instance of relief from the Police Fund which Mrs. McGee will receive. She was formerly married to a man of the name of Watson, in the police force, who, while conveying a prisoner to the watchhouse, was so seriously kicked in the back that consumption was induced, and he speedily died. On that occasion the donation of ” £100 was paid to the widow out of the Police Fund. Still we think that some testimonial from the citizens in token of their approval of the gallant conduct of McGee is eminently due.
The sergeant was aged 26 years when he died and was apparently stationed in the Sydney Metropolitan Area.
SYDNEY POLICE COURT. – Saturday ( Before the Police Magistrate, and J. McLerie, Esq., J.P. )
ASSAULTING A CONSTABLE.- A well-dressed young man, named William Byrnes, was charged with assaulting Constable Watson, in O’Connell street, at nine o’clock on Saturday night ( 14 February 1852 ).
It appeared from the evidence that some man, whose name is unknown, assaulted the defendant, and knocked him down. The constable interfered for the defendant, and apprehended his assailant, in return for which the defendant struck the constable several blows, and also kicked him in the stomach.
The defendant did not deny the assault, for which he expressed his contrition. The bench sentenced the defendant to pay a fine of 2/., and 2s. 6d. costs, in default to be imprisoned during fourteen days.
Bell’s Life in Sydney and Sporting Reviewer (NSW : 1845 – 1860), Saturday 21 February 1852, page 3
THE POLICE REGISTER.
The Height of Ingratitude. – Police constable Watson answered in the most lively and sonorous manner to his name when called upon to give evidence against William Byrnes, a stiff built nautical, for having inflicted divers kicks upon witness whilst engaged in affording him the protection of the law.
At the late hours on Saturday night Watson was doing his duty in O’Connell-street, when he saw the defendant levelled to the earth by a human fist.
Witness took the offender into custody; whereupon up rose Byrnes, and most ungraciously pitched into his Indigo friend, from whose grasp he rescued his antagonist. ” I am naturally mild,” cried Watson, ” but human flesh and blood cannot stand this. Come to the watchhouse.” ” Not I.” replied Byrnes, ” take me if you can.”
Watson sounded his whistle shrilly, but the Royal Civils did not start up around as did the clansmen – of Roderick Dhu – Watson was left alone with a very pretty little piece of work cut out for him. However, he tightened his belt, and went at Byrnes like a hero, and after a struggle of half an hour placed him carefully under lock and key.
The defendant had nothing to offer in explanation of his conduct but the police office cuckoo note – I was uncommon drunk – knew nothing of it – dare say he’s right – a man don’t like to be pulled and hauled about – did my best to prevent it, no doubt.
This plea was held insufficient by the P.M., who fined him in forty shillings and costs for base Ingratitude to his protector.
The Empire ( Sydney, NSW ) Wednesday 5 May 1852 p 3
PUBLICANS’ ANNUAL LICENSING MEETING,
The Court of Petty Sessions for considering applications for Publicans’ Licenses, adjourned from the 30th of last month, resumed its sittings yesterday.
The Right Worshipful the Mayor presided, and was assisted by the following Justices. The Police Magistrate, the Superintendent of Police, Messrs. Allen, Hill, Chambers, Moriarty, Mitchell, Brenan, Grant, and Brown.
George Snell Clark, applied for license for the Horse and Jockey, in Hunter-street. Mr. Cory appeared for the applicant, who was opposed by Inspector Holmes, for having, on the 14th of February, refused to assist a constable in the City Police, named John Watson, who had a prisoner in custody at the time, and which prisoner was rescued from his custody by a person who assaulted constable Watson, and inflicted severe injuries upon him. The objection further alleged that when a pair of handcuffs were handed to Mr. Clark to assist in securing the prisoner, he threw the handcuffs down on the ground.
Constable Watson related the facts of the case, and said that he had been unwell ever since the night the assault was committed upon him. In reply to a question put to him by Mr. Cory, Watson admitted that Mr. Clark had picked up his truncheon for him, Mr. McLerie stated that no complaint was made against the manner in which the applicant had hitherto conducted his licensed house, and he would therefore consent to withdraw, the objection, which had been raised to let publicans plainly understand that they were bound when called on in similar cases to render aid to the Police. The objection was then withdrawn, and the license granted.
NSWBDM = John WATSON. Death registration # 1131/1852 V1852113138B age 26
Camden General Cemetery is located on the corner of Cawdor and Burragorang Rds, Camden & was established in the late 1800’s.
The above information may have been contaminated with some of the below dates.
Further investigation needed. ( Cal 27 Oct 2016)
Danny WEBSTER has a person by the same name recorded as thus ( 2016 )
Sergeant John WATSON
St James Police Station
Assault Injuries – 25 October, 1852
Resting Place – St John’s Anglican Cemetery, Camden
Sergeant Watson is thought to have died on 25 October, 1852 as a result of the onset of tuberculosis following an assault by a prisoner he had removed from a hotel in Sydney.
On or about the 21 January, 1852 Sergeant Watson and Constables Clifford and Clarke attended the Lemon Tree Hotel and were asked by the proprietor to remove a man from the premises after he had refused to leave until he was served another drink.
The police were forced to drag the man from the premises and a hostile crowd soon formed outside to witness the ensuing brawl.
The Empire of 25 January, 1852 reported on the incident.
ASSAULTING THE POLICE
Robert Thompson appeared to answer the charge preferred against him by Sergeant Watson, for assaulting him in the execution of his duty, in Phillip-street, between the hours of nine and ten o’clock, on Wednesday evening. The defendant bore evident marks of ill-usage, his eyes being severely bruised.
Mr. Cory appeared for the prosecution, Mr. G. Wright, as amicus curia attended on behalf of the defendant.
It appeared from the evidence of Watson and two other constables that the son of Mr. Tuohy, a publican in Phillip-street, called at the St. James’ station-house, requesting the police to eject the defendant from his father’s house, as he was conducting himself in a disorderly manner.
Sergeant Watson went with two constables to Mr. Tuohy’s house, and defendant was ordered to quit, which he refused to do.
The policemen then ejected defendant from the house, and ordered him to go home. He refused, and caught hold of Watson by the legs, and endeavoured to throw him down.
The two constables released the sergeant from the defendant’s grasp, and he then kicked the sergeant in the breast.
The sergeant then said, “Take him to the watch-house.” The defendant was in liquor, and his conduct was very violent while being conveyed to the watch-house.
Several witnesses were called for the defendant, who testified that the policemen ill-used the defendant after the arrest, and that they beat him while conveying him to the watch-house.
The defendant was fined one shilling, and half-a-crown costs, which he immediately paid.
The offender later took civil action against the three police officers, who were defended in court by a Mr Nichols, who said in their defence, “The constables were human beings, and situated as they were, with a mob of upwards of one hundred people surrounding them, and calling out to them to let the man go, must naturally have been excited…
One witness had sworn that a constable waved his stick, and threatened a person in the crowd, but he would call a witness to prove that that constable had no stick with him…
The now complainant had been charged with assaulting a constable, one of the now defendants, and has been convicted and fined…
In conclusion, I would remark that the defendants were duty bound to apprehend the complainant, and they used no more violence than was necessary to take him.”
The hotel proprietor, a Mr Tuohy gave the following evidence during the hearing.
I am a publican residing in Phillip-street. On the night of the late Mayoral election the complainant was in my house between the hours of eight and nine o’clock.
I saw the constables, the three defendants, at my house.
My son went for them, in consequence of Mr. Thompson using threatening language, and saying that he could beat me, and my whole family.
Sergeant Watson told the complainant to go home with his wife. Complainant asked the sergeant if he knew his duty, and told him that his duty was outside instead of inside. I desired the constables to put complainant out of the house, as I was in dread of him. They again requested him to go home, which he refused to do. I was afraid he would do me some injury, because I had refused to draw more liquor for him, and again told the constables to turn him out. They took hold of him quietly, and he rushed against them, and tried to shut the door. They forced him outside, and then twice told him to go home. He replied, that he would remain there as long he liked. When down, he took the sergeant by the legs and the constables tried to loosen his hold. The sergeant caught hold of one of the verandah posts, to save himself from falling.
Thompson’s conduct was violent. I saw him kick when down outside my door. I could not say who he kicked at. I do not think the constables used more violence than necessary during the time I saw them.”
The matter was dismissed by the magistrate.
The sergeant was aged 26 years when he died and was stationed at the St James Police Station.
He was buried at Camden on 27 October, 1852 at which time his residence was recorded as Sydney.
He is not listed in the official New South Wales Police Honour Roll.
Constable Jeremiah SLATTERY
| 23/10/2012
Constable Jeremiah SLATTERY
Shot – Murdered
Bungendore
12 January, 1843
Constable Slattery was shot to death at Bungendore during a prisoner escort from Queanbeyan to Goulburn. Four prisoners were being escorted at the time by Constable Slattery and Constable William Burton of Queanbeyan Police and had stopped for the night at Mr Dwyer’s public house at Bungendore.
The story of the sad incident was told in the Sydney Morning Herald of Saturday 14 January, 1843:
Murder of a Constable. “A prisoner of the name of Porter, with three others, on their way down from Queanbeyan to Goulburn, who were escorted by two constables, had arrived at Bungendore, on Thursday evening, and put up for the night at Mr Dwyer’s public house; the constables allowed them to have their irons off, and put them into a room to sleep, one constable was to watch and the other was to sleep: both however dozed off, and one of the prisoners seized the opportunity, got up, laid hold of the carbine belonging to him who was to have kept watch, and shot him through the breast; he died almost immediately. An inquest was held on Friday evening, and a verdict of wilful murder was returned, and the scoundrel was committed by the coroner to take his trial for the same. Corporal Hewitt, of the Mounted Police, whose services are well known, apprehended the prisoner on a charge of robbery, near Queanbeyan, and from which Bench he was committed to take his trial for the offence, was sent for, who conducted and lodged him safely in Goulburn Gaol, on Saturday evening. Too much praise cannot be given to Mr Dwyer for his valorous conduct: the moment he heard the shot he rushed in and secured the other firearms, and bailed up the whole of the prisoners before he knew of the tragic affair which had taken place.
At the time of his death the constable appears to have been stationed at Queanbeyan.
Chief Constable Patrick KINSELA
| 23/10/2012
Chief Constable Patrick KINSELA
Horse & Cart Accident
Queanbeyan, NSW
23 February, 1841
On 23 February, 1841 Chief Constable Kinsela and Constable John Scott were travelling in a cart returning to Queanbeyan. While they were crossing a dry creek bed near the Elmsall Inn the cart overturned, killing Constable Kinsela. Scott luckily survived the accident and was later able to give coronial evidence. It is not known whether this accident occurred while the constable was on duty or not, however it is believed that he was, and research is continuing into this aspect of the incident. In those days police were considered to be always on duty.
Rumours were apparently circulated at the time that both Kinsela and Scott were drunk when the accident occurred, however this was soon discredited. The Sydney Gazette of 11 March, 1841 printed information from a correspondent who informed the readers that he had seen a person who has just come from Limestone; he reports that the Chief Constable and another man were killed by the upsetting of a dray in a creek in that neighbourhood; it is said the parties were drunk, but this is contradicted, as Kinsela was a sober man. (In other words, Kinsela did not drink alcohol at all).
The Australasian Chronicle of 4 March, 1841 reported the following.
QUEANBEYAN, FEBRUARY 27- There was an inquest held here on the 24th instant, on the body of Mr. Patrick Kinsala [sic], chief constable, who came by his death by the upsetting of his cart in crossing a creek close to his own house. The night was very dark, and he was thrown with such force on his head that his neck was dislocated. Kinsala was a very active officer, a friend to the poor, and always ready to attend when called on. He had obtained a few enemies for himself by being zealous in the discharge of his duty. He has left a wife and two children to deplore his loss, the youngest only nine days old…
Patrick Kinsela was a native of Ireland and had arrived at Queanbeyan in 1836. On 1 January, 1838 he became the first Chief Constable of Queanbeyan and Limestone Plains (Canberra) on an annual salary of £75. His appointment as Chief Constable was published in the Colonial Secretary’s Notice dated 7 February, 1838 which also listed ordinary constable appointments to Queanbeyan as James Pegg, Lockup Keeper, and Peter Connel and James Crossley. Captain Alured Tasker Faunce was also appointed as the Police Magistrate to Queanbeyan about the same time. Kinsela married Joanna Wigmore (nee Mehegan) on 6 February, 1838 and the couple had two children James and Mary. The constable is thought to have been buried in the Oaks Burial Grounds at Queanbeyan.
At the time of his death the constable was stationed at Queanbeyan and had been a police officer for a little over three years.
Source: Beyond Courage
Peter PROSSER
| 23/10/2012
Peter PROSSER
AKA ?
Late of ?
New South Wales Police Force
Regd. # Not listed on NSW State Govt. Archives – Registers of Police
Service: From? ? ?to23 January 1839 = ? years Service
Awards: No find on It’s An Honour
Born: ? ? 1812 – 1813?
Died on: Wednesday 23 January 1839
Age: 26
Cause: Murdered – Clubbed to death with a Nulla Nulla ( Waddy ) * see below
Event location: Phillip St, Sydney
Event date: Monday 21 January 1839
Funeral date: Friday 25 January 1839
Funeral location: ?
Wake location: ?
Funeral Parlour: ?
Buried at: Devonshire St Cemetery, Sydney – January 1839.
In 1901 his remains were exhumed to make space for Central Railway Station and re-interred, with thousands of others and 2285 tombstones of the first settlers in Australia, at the new cemetery at La Perouse, named Bunnerong Cemetery.
In 1976, the Botany Cemetery Trust destroyed most of these historic monuments by creating a new, low maintenance lawn area. The remaining 746 headstones were reinstalled in concrete strips, unrelated to the graves below them. The new lawn was named Pioneer Memorial Park.
The words recorded as being on his original tombstone are “Peter, the son of Edward and Mary Ann PROSSER, who was struck by John PENDER; in the execution of his duty 25th January 1839 which caused his death in 48 hours. He was an Inspector in the Sydney police and an Active officer. also sisters Adeliza and Jane, passengers in the ship ‘Fairlie’.
Adeliza buried at the Cape in October ???? Jane aged 16 years. Adeliza aged 29 years. Peter aged 26 years”.
Memorial located at: ?
[alert_green] PETERIS mentioned on the Police Wall of Remembrance[/alert_green]
[divider_dotted]
FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED ABOUT THIS PERSON, THEIR LIFE, THEIR CAREER AND THEIR DEATH.
On the afternoon of 21 January, 1839 a man named John Pender ( known to Sydney police as “Jack the Waterman“ ) was behaving in an indecent manner in Raynor’s Public House, Sydney. As a result of his behaviour he was arrested by Inspector Prosser who began to march him to the Sydney Police Watch-house.
En route they passed Pender‘s home in Phillip Street where a mob attacked the inspector and dragged his prisoner into the house. Prosser clung to his prisoner desperately however, until he received a blow from a club to the back of his neck, which resulted in his death a few days later in hospital. Pender was quickly apprehended and charged with murder, while five others were also charged in relation to the riot.
The Sydney Gazette and New South Wales Advertiser of 24 January, 1839 reported the incident in some detail.
BRUTAL MURDER.
On Monday afternoon a man named John Pender, well known about the town as the driver of a water-cart, and a bad character, went into the public-house of Mr. Rayner at the corner of Hunter and Phillip-streets and in the absence of the landlord was guilty of much indecent behaviour.
He was remonstrated with by the landlady, but this seemed to have the effect of urging him on to still farther excesses. He approached Mrs. R., who was behind the bar, when she took up a New Zealand waddy to defend herself; this the brute wrested from her, and after having struck her he left the house, flourishing the weapon over his head and making a great noise.
He was perceived at the time by Inspector Prosser, who was approaching alone. Prosser came up behind him unperceived and took the waddy from him, and desired him to accompany him to the watch-house.
Pender accompanied the Inspector a short distance, when, stopping suddenly, he turned round and struck Prosser a violent blow on the face with his fist, which knocked him down. While he was on the ground, the man stooped down and snatched the waddy from the hands of the Inspector, and as the latter was rising to his feet he struck him a tremendous blow with it on the back of his neck, and then ran into his own house which was close at hand.
“A mob of blackguards, as usual on such occasions, soon assembled on the spot, and although they witnessed this unprovoked outrage none among them were inclined to render the poor fellow any assistance, but rather endeavoured to screen the villain and hasten his escape. After a few moments Prosser was seen to get on his feet with difficulty and move on towards the watch-house, holding his hands to his head. He shortly afterwards met Sergeant Kilpatrick, and desired him to go and apprehend Pender who, he said, had murdered him.
Killpatrick hastened to the station-house for assistance, and procured that of the two keepers, the only persons present, and the three then returned to Phillip-street.
In the meantime, the wounded Inspector got to the watch-house, and was shortly afterwards found by Sergeant Partington lying across one of the benches, nearly dead; he called for assistance, and Mr. Driver, the publican, attended and with vinegar attempted to revive him.
Dr. Whittle, who was near the spot, was then sent for; he immediately attended and by copious bleeding restored animation, but Prosser continued in such a dangerous state that his immediate removal to the Hospital was recommended and performed.
The Police had in the interim secured Pender and five or six other persons who appeared to take a prominent part in the mob assembled in Phillip Street.”
The Sydney Morning Herald dated 25 January, 1839 printed the following brief account of the inquest into Inspector Prosser‘s death.
An inquest was held at the same place the same day, on the body of Peter Prosser, lately an Inspector of the Sydney Police. The evidence was very lengthy but the substance was very simple, viz, that Prosser had a man named Pender in custody, and that Pender in order to make his escape struck the deceased a blow on the head with a New Zealander’s waddy, which was so violent as to cause an extra vasation of blood on the brain, from the effects of which Prosser died. The Jury returned a verdict of willful murder against Pender, who was committed on the Coroner’s warrant.
At the time of his death the inspector was aged 26 and was attached to the Sydney Police.
Judging by newspaper accounts of the time, he was a courageous and energetic policeman who seemed to have worked tirelessly against violent offenders in the inner city of Sydney. He is not listed in the official New South Wales Police Honour Roll.
A ‘waddy’, it is believed, is similar to an Aboriginal nulla nulla. A waddy is a heavy club constructed of carved timber and could also be a walking stick. No doubt, the ‘green stone’ referred to, was attached to the end of the Nulla Nulla and held in place with tree resin.
It would appear that the Rank structure of this period ( 1835 ) was:
Patrolman –
Constable –
Conductor –
Inspector –
Sydney Gazette and New South Wales Advertiser (NSW : 1803 – 1842), Saturday 9 August 1834, page 4
Government Gazette
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 6.
HIS Excellency the GOVERNOR has been pleased to approve of the following Alterations in the Police of the Colony, namely
SYDNEY.
APPOINTMENTS
John Price, free, to be Conductor, from the 18th June.
To be Patrolman – James Woodward, free, from the 25th June; John Murray, free, from the 5th July ; Peter Prosser, free, from the 8th ultimo; John Gorman, free, from the 14th ultimo ; Edward Tierney, free, and John McCarthy, free, from the 15th ultimo ; Bryant Naughton, free, from the 16th ultimo ; Michael Armstrong, free, from the l7th ultimo, and James Cook, free, from the 18th ultimo.
Thomas McConnell, free, to be Constable at the North Shore, from the 16th June, and James Woodward, free, to be Constable of the Water Police, from the 5th July.
RESIGNATION
John William Smith, Constable, North Shore, on the 15th June.
DISMISSALS
Patrolmen – John Sullivan, on 24th June ; Patrick Muleady, on the 7th ultimo; James Drew and Patrick Dougharty, on the 13th ultimo ; David Leighton, on the 14th ultimo , George Stewart, on the 15th ultimo; and Patrick Curran, and John Sheehy, on the 17th July.
Water Police Constable — Alexander Lee, on the 4th July,
STRATHALLAN.
William Berry, free, to be Constable in the room of William Carroll, resigned.
MAITLAND.
Edward Gaynor, holding a Ticket-of-Leave, to be Constable, from the 14th ultimo, in the room of Daniel McFarlane, resigned.
PORT STEPHENS.
Michael Cotton, holding a ticket-of-Leave, to be Constable, in the room of John Jaggers, resigned.
New South Wales Government Gazette (Sydney, NSW : 1832 – 1900), Wednesday 21 January 1835 (No.151), page 45
Colonial Secretary’s Office,
Sydney, 20th January, 1835.
HIS Excellency the GOVERNOR has been pleased to approve of the following alterations in the Police of the Colony ; namely,—
SYDNEY.
To be Conductors.— Edward Rollins and Peter Prosser, raised from Patrolmen, from the 1st instant.
To be Patrolmen.— William Elkins, and to be Market Constable, from the 1st instant ; Mark Gilmore, Michael O’Neal, William Howarth, Thomas Barrett, James Carwell, and William Barnett, from the 1st instant ; James Matthews, Robert Lodge, John Hundley, and James Kennedy, from the 9th instant ; and John McCarthy, from the 13th instant.
Conductors Dismissed.— William Barnett, reduced to Patrolman.
Patrolmen Dismissed.— George Brereton, Market Constable ; Herbert Green, James Matthews, John Cummings, James Carwell, John Smith, Peter Butler, Peter Christie, and Peter Colgan.
New South Wales Government Gazette (Sydney, NSW : 1832 – 1900), Wednesday 29 April 1835 (No.165), page 257
Colonial Secretary’s Office,
Sydney, 28th April, 1835.
HIS Excellency the GOVERNOR has been
pleased to approve of the following alterations
in the Police of the Colony, namely :—
SYDNEY.— To be Wardsman : George Mitchell, from the 6th instant.
To be Conductors : Philip Boyce, from the 1st, John Moore, from the 7th, William Hanson, from Joe 14th, and John Matthews, from the 20th of April.
To be Patrolmen : Peter Prosser, James Shaw, Archibald Kelley, and Dennis Connelly, from the 1st instant ; Thomas Kinchela, from the 14th instant, ; John Thorn, John Pendar, James Jackson and William Troop, from the 16th instant ; John Price, and William Vernon, from the 17th, and Patrick Galvin, from the 20th of April.
Wardsman resigned : John Skinner.
Conductors Dismissed : Peter Prosser, Patrick Ogan, and John Price.
Patrolmen resigned : William Howarth, John Gorman, James Tobin.
Patrolmen dismissed : Robert Grindle, James Cone, John Carey, John Connor, James Wells, Patrick Fitzpatrick, and L. Walsh.
LIVERPOOL.— George Harvey, holding a Ticket-of-leave, to be Constable, from the 20th Instant, in the room of Denis McCarthy, resigned.
PENRITH.— John Baxter, free, to be Constable, from the 26th Ultimo, in the room of John Brown, dismissed.
BONG BONG.— John Coffee and Lawrence Larken, free, to be Constables— the former in the room of, James Harper, resigned, and the latter from the 20th Instant, in the room of William Austin, dismissed.
YASS.— James Donald, free, to be Constable, from the 20th of February last.
MERTON.— Jeremiah Burns, holding a Ticket-of-leave, to be Constable, from the 6th Ultimo, in the room of Thomas Boline, resigned.
PORT STEPHENS.— John McCarthy, free, to be Constable, in the room of Edward Frost, resigned.
HIS EXCELLENCY the Governor has been pleased to approve of the following alterations in the Police of the Colony, viz. :—
SYDNEY.
To be Wardsman.— William Abbott, from the 1st instant.
To be Conductors.— Matthew Thomkins and John Price, from the 1st instant ; James Shaw, from the 4th instant ; Peter Prosser, from the 12th instant.
To be Patrolmen.— Patrick Conner, William Moore, William Cox, John Kelly and Stephen Bunen, from the 1st instant ; Thomas Lynskey, from the 4th instant ; Timothy Foley and Andrew White, from the 8th instant ; James Pearson, Samuel Deacon, and Samuel Freebury, from the 12th instant.
Wardsman resigned.— William Small.
Conductor resigned.— Constantine Molloy.
Conductor Patrick Reid, reduced to Patrolman on 30th ultimo.
Wardsman dismissed.— William Abbott.
Patrolmen dismissed.— William Brown, William McCready, James McGruggan, William Noop, Patrick Petty, Thomas Phillips, John Hauley, Michael Armstrong.
LIVERPOOL.
Daniel McCarthy, holding a Ticket-of-leave, to be Constable, from the 18th instant, in the room of James Silvester, resigned.
PENRITH.
William Rossborough, holding a Ticket-of-leave, and Thomas Shuttleworth, also holding a Ticket-of leave, to be Constables, in the room of Ralph Hodgson and Henry Workman, dismissed— the former from the 10th and the latter form the 30th ultimo.
PATRICK’S PLAINS.
Constable John Brest, dismissed on the 20th instant.
Sydney Monitor and Commercial Advertiser (NSW : 1838 – 1841), Wednesday 13 February 1839, page 2
Before Mr. Justice Willis and a Civil Jury.
John Pendar, alias “‘ Jack the Waterman” was tried yesterday for the murder of Inspector Prosser.
The case occupied Mr Justice Willis and a civil Jury up to half-past nine o’clock, when the Jury returned a verdict of manslaughter.
Mr Windeyer was counsel for the defence, and raised three objections – which were,
that there was no proof of drunkenness to warrant the deceased in taking the prisoner into custody,
that the prisoner would have been justified in using force to any degree to expel the constable, who was in fact transgressing on his premises, and
lastly the learned gentleman relied upon a statute ; which he believed was in force, as far back as Henry the Eighth ( which had never been repealed ; rendering fatal any indictment not drawn up in intelligible English, and
contended that ” Waddy” was not an English word, and therefore fatal to the indictment.
These objections were reserved and the prisoner remanded for sentence.
Commercial Journal and Advertiser (Sydney, NSW : 1835 – 1840), Wednesday 20 February 1839, page 2
James Pendar alias Jack the Waterman, for the manslaughter of Inspector Prosser, was brought up for sentence yesterday, and ordered to be transported for the term of his natural life to Norfolk Island.
Sydney Gazette and New South Wales Advertiser (NSW : 1803 – 1842), Thursday 21 February 1839, page 2
Supreme Court.
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1839.
(Before their Honors the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Willis.)
On this day there being no cases ready for trial, the prisoners remanded during the Sessions were brought up for sentence.
John Pender was next placed at the bar. The prisoner had been tried for the wilful murder of Peter Prosser, a policeman, and had been found guilty of manslaughter.
Mr. Justice Willis, before whom the case was tried, said to the prisoner that the mercy of the Jury had saved his life in finding him guilty of manslaughter – the manslaughter was of a more aggravated nature than he had ever known or heard of.
The police must be protected in their duty, and should be protected.
His sentence was that he should be transported for life.
Sydney Gazette and New South Wales Advertiser (NSW : 1803 – 1842), Saturday 26 January 1839, page 2
DOMESTIC INTELLIGENCE.
Coroner’s INQUEST. –
On Thursday morning at nine o’clock an Inquest was held upon the body of Prosser, the late Inspector of Police, who died in the General Hospital on the preceding day. The Jury assembled at the sign of the Bunch of Grapes ( King St ), whence they proceeded to the Hospital to view the body, and then returned to the Jury room, where the following evidence was taken :
John Pender, the man charged with the murder, being in custody.
Jane Rayner, of Phillip-street, being sworn stated, I knew the deceased Peter Prosser, and the prisoner before the Court ( John Pender ); I keep a public-house.
On Monday afternoon the prisoner came into my house very tipsey; he made use of very bad language to me, and I refused to serve him, telling him if he could not use better language to me he should leave the place; he then turned round and exposed his naked person to me twice ; I took up a jug of water and threw it over him, and desired him to be off about his business for an impudent blackguard ; that appeared to enrage him the more ; he turned towards me as if he would strike me; I took up a New Zealand waddy to defend myself as he was making to me ; he snatched it from me, and struck me a blow across the shoulder, and afterwards made several blows at me with the waddy, which I avoided ; I thought he would kill me, and I sent my little girl to the watch-house for a constable ; the prisoner then went into the street making a noise, and flourishing the waddy ; in the mean time Prosser came up, and seeing how badly the prisoner behaved, who was storming violently, and flourishing the waddy, he approached him, and I cautioned him of the weapon the prisoner held in his hand ;
Prosser came up behind the prisoner, and took the waddy out of his hand ; and collared him ; the prisoner forced himself into my house in the custody of the deceased, and said he would not go to the watch-house; I told the deceased of his bad behaviour, and said I would appear the next day against the prisoner;
the deceased then told him he must go to the watch-house ; the prisoner tried to get away by the back door, but the deceased stopped him ; at this time a mob of persons had come into the house ; with some difficulty the deceased induced the prisoner to go quietly with him ; they left the house together; I cannot say which of them had the waddy as I was so confused ; I did not leave the place to look outside to see which way they went, but I saw that they turned towards the watch-house ; they had to pass the prisoner’s house on their way there; the deceased had much difficulty with the prisoner in the house ; I cannot say whether the prisoner was struck ; the deceased had to scuffle with him to make him submit and go with him ; I am dull of hearing, and cannot say whether the prisoner made use of any threatening language to the deceased, but they struggled a good deal with each other ; I saw nothing after they left the house.
By the Prisoner. – I cannot say that I saw any blows struck ; there was much struggling; several people were in the house; Mr. Roberts‘ servant was there.
George Clark, free, was then sworn. I recollect seeing the deceased and prisoner in Mrs. Rayner‘s house on Monday last; I saw Mrs. Rayner point out and give charge of the prisoner to deceased ; Prosser came behind him, snatched the waddy out of his hand, and dragged the prisoner towards the watch-house; the prisoner struggled, and seized hold of a fence, on which the deceased pushed at him with the staff or waddy ; they both got back to Rayner‘s ; I looked in and saw a struggle ; the prisoner attempted to get out by the back door and the deceased either struck or knocked him down ; he was down ; they had some high words in the house, and the prisoner took the staff from Prosser, on which the latter attempted to get it again ; the prisoner refused to let him have it, and said he should not have it, but he would go to the watch-house ; they then went quietly that way, the prisoner holding the staff;
I stood at the corner to watch them ; as they passed the prisoner’s house the prisoner forced himself in ; they had a scuffle ; I went down to them, and saw that Prosser had got the staff from him, and was shaking the prisoner to get him to the watch-house; the prisoner refused, on which the deceased struck him a blow on the head ; the prisoner refused to go to the watch-house, and wanted to get into his own house; I cannot say what occurred immediately in the house ; in about a minute I saw Prosser staggering out holding his hands to his head ; I could not tell whether he said any thing, as there was such a noise at the time; a young man had the waddy in his hand, and said, ” that shall not be used again.”
No one else came out of the house but the deceased ; Prosser went towards the watch-house; he continued reeling as he walked along the street as far as four or five houses; I was not exactly opposite the prisoner‘s house, and could not see into it ; the young man before mentioned was in the yard of the prisoner about a minute after the deceased came but ; the deceased was then going out of the yard, and the prisoner was in his own house; I saw some blood coming down the head of the deceased, but I saw no mark upon his face ; I did not notice the young man who had the waddy until after Prosser came out of the house ; if he had come out of the house I must have seen him ; I walked out of the yard after the deceased into Phillip-street, as I thought he would fall, and I did not return ; Prosser was coming out of the prisoner‘s house when I arrived ; he had no hat on ; I heard no noise of blows when I came to the door ; I should know the person of the young man who had the waddy if I were to see him again; the prisoner and the deceased struggled very much for about seven or eight minutes before they went into the house ; they remained in about three or five minutes; I did not see Prosser fall, nor did I observe any marks of a fall upon his clothes; in about three minutes after I lost sight of Prosser while I was conversing with Mr. West opposite Pender‘s house ; I saw the prisoner standing opposite his fence going down the street, and two constables running round him to get in front of him ; the prisoner got over his fence, and was defending himself with the waddy, and the constables striking with their staves.
By the Prisoner.- I saw the deceased hit you several times; there were several marks upon you.
William Badcock examined- I recollect on Monday last, seeing the prisoner and the deceased in Phillip-street ; I saw the prisoner before he was in custody and afterwards ; I saw the struggle, and saw Prosser lay hold of the prisoner’s hair, and endeavour to knock his head against the door of Mr. Rayner‘s house; I also saw him endeavour to kick him, which the prisoner prevented by holding up his leg ; the prisoner got up and said he wished to speak to Prosser; they went quietly along Phillip-street, till another came up to the assistance of the deceased ; when opposite the prisoner‘s house a scuffle ensued ; I can’t say whether it was occasioned by the violence of the other constable or a desire of the prisoner to get into his house ; the other constable was evidently drunk, and struck the prisoner with his staff on the head ; the prisoner got to his own door, and Prosser sent the other constable away for assistance; the deceased had the waddy in his hand when he entered the house; I did not see the deceased strike prisoner any blows in the struggle that took place as they entered the house ; there was blood on the prisoner‘s face and shirt, which was produced by the blow of the drunken constable ; they entered the house and I followed them ; they were struggling on the bed, the deceased being uppermost ; Prosser was holding the prisoner‘s shirt collar with one hand, and thrusting his knuckles into his throat ; in my opinion with the intention of strangling him, and with the other arm trying to hold the waddy from the prisoner; in the struggle the prisoner succeeded in getting the waddy out of Prosser‘s hand, and the deceased held his hand upon the arm of the prisoner that had the waddy in it ; it was then the prisoner struck the deceased with the flat part of the waddy upon the top of his head ; he did not fall from the blow, but he put his hand to his head and cried “oh,” and walked out of the house and down Phillip-street as far as I then could see him ; he went away without his hat; I did not see the deceased strike the prisoner with the waddy ; I do not believe he struck him at all ; the prisoner was very drunk ; after the drunken constable had been despatched for assistance, the prisoner continued his resistance and violence to Mr. Prosser; I did not consider he intended to injure Mr. Prosser ; he was very lenient to him, and it was only on the deceased taking him by the throat, as I thought to strangle him, that he struck him ; I did not hear the sound of the blow, but it evidently stunned him ; I was so interested in the proceeding that I noticed only the actions of the parties; there was no other person in the house ; after the deceased left the house the prisoner pulled off his shoes and stockings, brandished the waddy, and was more violent than ever ; he only struck one blow ; he appeared stupidly as well as furiously drunk ; when in liquor he appeared almost mad ; I did not hear Prosser say anything to the prisoner in the house, he attempted to conquer him by force.
( Constable Bradley being produced, was identified by him as having struck the prisoner on the head. )
Sergeant ( William ) Kilpatrick of the Police was next examined.- He stated, on Monday last I was in the station-house when Bradley came in, between one and two o’clock, and said that a number of persons had assembled in Phillip street, and that Mr. Prosser was beaten and wanted assistance; I went there immediately with Bradley ; I met the deceased about fifteen or twenty yards from the prisoner‘s house ;
he held both his hands to his head and had his handkerchief to the left side of his face, where a scar appeared ; he turned round and pointed to the prisoner, who was in view with blood upon his shirt, and said, ” there’s the man, Kilpatrick, that struck me, take him into custody ;” he then walked on towards the watch-house ; I went in pursuit of the prisoner, who had a waddy in his hand and put himself in a posture to attack me; I secured him in his own house ; Bradley was with me, he struck the prisoner in my presence; he was perfectly sober.
( The witness here observed that almost immediately afterwards Bradley came to him in the watch-house and said that he heard that a charge of drunkenness had been preferred against him, and he wished him to smell his breath to see if he could distinguish any smell of liquor, he did so but could discover none. )
Bradley struck the prisoner so did I ; I made several blows at his hand with my staff to make him drop the waddy ; Bradley was not violent but cool and deliberate ; the prisoner did not say anything respecting Prosser; he was intoxicated and very violent; he made one determined blow at me with the waddy which I caught on my staff, the dent occasioned by it still remains ; I afterwards saw Prosser in the station-house, he seemed feeble and almost dead. ( The prisoner put a few unimportant questions that did not affect the evidence. )
One of the Jurymen, Mr. Driver, here stepped forward and observed to the Coroner that he saw Constable Bradley about ten minutes after the transaction, and he was then perfectly sober.
Dr. Robertson certified that the deceased was received into the Hospital about ten o’clock on Monday evening in a state of insensibility. There was a small scar of recent formation on his left cheek. On a post mortem examination of the body, he found on opening the skull a large quantity of extravasated blood on the back part of the brain, and the whole of the back part of the brain appeared to have been in a violent state of inflammation, sufficient to produce death. The effects, he was of opinion, were such as would have been produced by the blow of a flat, heavy instrument applied violently, such as a waddy. The extravasation and inflammation consequent thereon produced death.
Dr. Whittel corroborated the evidence of the other Doctor, as to the appearances on the post mortem examination. He in addition, stated that he had been called to attend the deceased shortly after he received the blow ; he bled him and recommended his removal to the Hospital.
The Coroner had commenced summing up the evidence, when it was intimated that a young man was present who was there at the time the blow was given.
He was called in and examined. He stated that his name was Manuel Josephson, and that he arrived at Pender‘s house when the deceased held the prisoner against the wall of the house. On their entering the house he could not tell which carried the waddy, but when they were inside ( the witness having followed them ) he saw the waddy lying on a chest beside the bed. As soon as Prosser observed it there he took it up to secure it, on which the prisoner snatched at it ; they struggled and the deceased got Pender down on the bed, but the prisoner succeeded in getting possession of the instrument with which he struck the deceased on his naked head.
Prosser arose from the bed after receiving the blow, and, uttering a cry, he staggered out of the house ; and shortly afterwards Pender was apprehended. He added, that in his opinion the deceased used no unnecessary violence in securing the prisoner.
The Coroner having summed up the evidence and explained the distinctions between manslaughter and murder, pointed out the fact of the prisoner being in the commission of an unlawful act, was given into the custody of a peace-officer, whose attempts to take him to the watch-house he resisted with a deadly instrument.
The jury, after a short consultation, returned a verdict of wilful murder against John Pender, who was forthwith committed on the Coroner’s warrant.
The prisoner is a man of low stature but of great apparent strength of body and very muscular, whereas the deceased was a man of very delicate habits of body.
Sydney Gazette and New South Wales Advertiser (NSW : 1803 – 1842), Saturday 1 August 1835, page 4
By His Excellency’s Command,
ALEXANDER McLEAY.
Colonial Secretary’s Office, Sydney,
28th July 1835.
HIS Excellency the Governor has been pleased to approve of the following alterations in the Police of the Colony, vis –
SYDNEY.
To be Wardsman – William Abbott, from the 1st instant.
To be Conductors – Matthew Thompkins and John Price, from the 1st instant ; James Shaw, from the 4th instant ; Peter Prosser, from the 12th instant.
To be Patrolmen – Patrick Connor, William Moore, William Cox, John Kelly, and Stephen Bunen from the 1st instant ; Thomas Lynskey, from the 4th instant ; Timothy Foley and Andrew White,
from the 8th instant ; James Pearson, Samuel Deacon, and Samuel Freebury, from the 12th instant.
Wardsman resigned – William Small.
Conductor resigned – Constantine Molloy
ConductorPatrick Reid, reduced to Patrolman on the 30th ultimo.
Wardsman dismissed – William Abbott.
Conductor dismissed – Henry Ball.
Patrolmen dismissed – William Brown. William McCready, James McGruggIn, William Noop,Patrick Petty, Thomas Phillips, John Hanley, Michael Armstrong.
LIVERPOOL.
Daniel McCarthy, holding a Ticket-of-Leave, to be Constable, from the 18th instant, in the room of James Silvester, resigned.
PENRITH.
William Rossborough, holding a Ticket-of-Leave, and Thomas Shuttleworth, also holding a Ticket of Leave, to be Constables, in the room of Ralph Hodgson and Henry Workman, dismissed-the former from the 10th and the latter from the 30th ultimo.
PATRICK’S PLAINS.
Constable John Brest, dismissed on the 30th instant.
Sydney Monitor and Commercial Advertiser (NSW : 1838 – 1841), Friday 26 April 1839, page 2
Perjury
Joseph Cutts , a free man, in the service of Mr. Thompson of Phillip-street, was charged by Constable Callaghan with assaulting him in the execution of his duty.
Callaghan deposed, that as he was passing a dray standing in Phillip-street, about half past seven on Monday evening, a dog under the dray ( chained ) flew at him.
He struck it in return. The prisoner said, he might as well strike him as strike his dog, and he would serve him as Prosser had been served by Jack the Waterman, and immediately struck him, the witness.
The drayman had a child in his arms, which he gave to a woman to hold, while he struck witness. He then made into his master’s house, and witness followed him, and struck him with his staff. He also sprang his rattle.
The prisoner denied having struck the constable, and called witnesses. —
Mary Mahany, a soldier’s widow, residing opposite the master of the prisoner, in Phillip street, deposed, that a person left a loaded team standing opposite her door, with a dog on the chain to guard it, while he went over the way to get tea, and she promised to mind it.
The constable came up drunk, the dog barked, and the constable began to irritate it with his staff, and said, if he had it off the chain, he would knock its brains out.
Witness told him, he had better let the dog alone, and go about his business. He called her a dirty w—–.
The prisoner, who was by with his child in his arms, said, he ought to be ashamed to make use of such language to the mother of children. He immediately ran over and knocked prisoner down twice with his child in his arms, and began springing his rattle and making a disturbance.
John Thomas, a dealer, deposed, that the constable was drunk, and corroborated the evidence of the last witness, as far as it went.
The constable also spit in witness’s face, and would have taken witness to the watch house, had he, witness, not got out of the way. ( When the last witness went into the box, he asked the constable if he had any recollection of him? He denied ever having seen his face before. I thought so, said the witness, you were too drunk. )
Case dismissed.
The constable was ordered to be reported.
Such is the case, as handed to us by our reporter.
We are surprised that men of such tact as Messrs. Windeyer and Innes, did not either order the witness into the box for gross perjury, or the constable; for grosser and more malicious impudent lies, were never told in a court of justice, than what must have been told by one or more of these opposing witnesses.
If Magistrates and Judges will not take the trouble to prosecute for perjury so glaring and open, as that which has evidently been committed by one or other of the witnesses in this case, the land will never be purged of this abominable and daily committed crime.
JOHN PENDER was an ardent collector of curios. In his rough, ignorant fashion, he expressed his love of the beautiful by picking up, from all the seaports of the world, things that were odd and rare, and fetching them to his bachelor home on the Strawberry Hills in Sydney.
Of the hardy sea-faring men of the ‘thirties he was one of the most adventurous. Wanderlust had taken him back and forth over the seven seas, to strange ports and strange lands. His little cottage was a veritable museum of curiosities, a centre of attraction for half the population of Sydney when the owner was ashore after one of his exciting voyages.
Pender, as is not uncommon with men of his calibre and peculiar mental composition, was loquacious concerning his exploits, and insistently eager to confirm the impression that he was more than an ordinary being.
Towards the end of 1838, Pender landed in Sydney after an adventurous trip to New Zealand, bringing back with him a large collection of Maori weapons, including a huge club with a greenstone head, taken by him in single-handed fight with a tattoed chief of the savages.
This curiously carved weapon was regarded by the sailor as the gem of his collection. He never tired relating the story of the fight that made it his, and day by day, he grew more boastful about its alleged intrinsic value.
Throughout the Christmas festivities, he paraded the street with the club over his shoulder, chanting war songs in outlandish tongue, and generally making a nuisance of himself to the more peaceably inclined citizens.
Inspector Peter Prosser, of the Sydney Police Force, did not look with any favor on Pender and his boisterous ways. On several occasions he reprimanded the sailor sternly for his obstreperous behaviour, once or twice driving him off the streets when his boasting and warlike antics with the greenstone club terrified passers by.
Pender was more disturbed than he showed by this unceremonious treatment at the hands of a high officer of the law. Having come to believe that his prowess gave him the right to swagger and riot through the streets of any sea-port town, he bitterly resented that his inclinations should be frustrated In the place where he had made his home, and on Monday, January 21, he was very much in evidence, parading the streets with the club in his hand and a Maori rug tied about his shoulders, loudly proclaiming that he was afraid of no man.
His eccentric behaviour did not seriously impede Sydney’s general affairs during the forenoon, and Inspector Prosser not being about, he progressed from inn to inn accumulating large quantities of spirits. During early afternoon he wandered into the bar of Mrs. Jane Rayner’s Inn in King Street, and, thumping the counter with his club, called for drinks for those assembled. The loungers about the place were only too willing to partake of his hospitality, but as the audience was too insignificant for the sailor, he visited the various parlors and tap-rooms and extended his invitation to the occupants. In this way he gathered another eight men into the bar, but at one parlor his peremptory invitation to drink was as peremptorily refused.
Three squatters from the interior, discussing a matter of important business, so resented his intrusion on their privacy that they threatened stern measures if he did not take himself off.
Pender was not far enough gone in drink to be thoroughly quarrelsome, but nevertheless he expressed his opinion of the squatters with such disgusting profanity that they rose to their feet. One of them rushed the sailor, and, taking him by the shoulders, thrust him down a passage into the street. Then he returned and, calling on his friends, left the house; Before going, however, he informed the landlady that neither he nor any of his associates would patronise the tavern again.
Loss of Profits
Mrs. Rayner was considerably put out at losing such profitable customers, and upbraided Pender in vigorous terms when he re-entered the bar a minute later. The seafarer, now furious and irresponsible, threatened to smash up the bar if anything more were said. The landlady was just as brave and determined as the sailor.
Seizing the war-club, which was lying on the counter, she brought it down with a heavy thwack on Pender‘s shoulders and threatened to crack his skull if he did not leave the premises. From her fortress behind the bar, the landlady whirled the stoneheaded weapon, striking at Pender whenever he attempted to seize it.
The half-crazed man was shouting loudly, and using dreadful language as he rushed about the room, creating such an uproar that a crowd quickly gathered in the street. When the disturbance was at its height, Inspector Prosser entered the bar. Taking in the situation at a glance, he rushed at the sailor, grasped him about the middle, and hurled him through the door. While Pender was attempting to rise, the inspector rushed him again and tried to handcuff him. Both men were of like build, and both in perfect physical condition. The sailor, despite the quantity of drink he had absorbed during the morning, was not greatly affected by his libations, and began to fight for his liberty. For half an hour the pair struggled and fought in the Street, none of the crowd offering to interfere.
Prosser, a skilful boxer, plied his fists vigorously, battering his antagonist’s face until it was a mask of blood, Pender, employing tactics of the sea-front, used his feet and hands impartially, but with scant success.
At length Prosser, planting a blow on Pender‘s jaw, felled him insensible to the ground.
When the sailor recovered he was manacled and helpless.
Signifying his intention to proceed quietly to the watch-house, he was permitted to rise, and, held by Prosser, moved down the street. Over his shoulder the inspector carried the war-club. As they were walking along, the sailor informed his captor that he would like to visit his home before going to prison, there being two cats and several birds in the house he desired to liberate.
Prosser, yielding to persuasion, diverted his progress towards Strawberry Hills, and a quarter of an hour later entered the sailor’s cottage with his prisoner. At the door the inspector was seen to unlock the handcuffs on the sailor’s wrists, a proceeding that many of those among the crowd that followed considered a dangerous proceeding.
No warning of this was shouted to the police officer, but when a few moments later he came reeling out through the door to collapse on the ground, those present realised that something tragic had occurred. In the Inspector‘s head was a ghastly wound, clearly caused by a blow from the war-club.
Two men, George Clark and Richard Roberts -rushed into the house. On the floor of the front room they found the blood-stained club. Pender they beheld escaping through the gate at the rear.
Sergt. W. Kilpatrick and Constable Boadley were soon in pursuit of the murderer. Through the streets they chased him, Pender running at a tangent, and screaming insanely of men he had killed in other parts of the world. People dashed from his path and took shelter in the houses. Doors were slammed in his face, but none attempted to lay hold of him. The police took him at last near the Hyde Park Barracks. He had turned at bay, producing a long sailor’s knife, with which he menaced his pursuers. The constables, however, furious at the death of their superior, braved the maddened seafarer, and overwhelmed him with their truncheons.
They battered him into unconsciousness and then, securing a wheelbarrow, trundled him to the Watch-house where he regained his senses.
At his trial some months later, Pender was the most unconcerned man in the court. He sat in the dock eating pears from a bag and spitting out the skin at the constables.
He refused to plead, or give any explanation of the tragic happening in the cottage, a course which decided his fate.
The Judge had nothing else to do but to order his execution.
The green-stone war-club was given to Mrs. Jane Rayner by a formal order of the court, for what reason was not apparent, and her descendants may have it to this day. .
[alert_green]James IS mentioned on the Police Wall of Remembrance[/alert_green]
NSW Trooper James HARDMAN touch plate at the National Police Wall of Remembrance.
( Dabee – as mentioned on the touch plate, is an area near Rylstone / Kandos, NSW which is part of the Mudgee area. There is also a property by the name of Dabee in the Kandos region )
Mounted Trooper Hardman ( formerly of the 17thand 28th Regiments ) was shot to death by bushrangers near Bathurst, however few details are known other than those contained in a couple of brief newspaper articles of the time. A reward of fifty pounds, or a conditional pardon, was offered on 22 October, 1836 for information leading to the apprehension of those who had ” most wickedly and barbarously murdered “ Corporal Hardman in August of that year.
The Sydney Morning Herald of 7 November, 1836 reported that ” On Saturday, Alexander Lambert was convicted of aiding and assisting in the wilful murder of Corporal Hardman of the Mounted Police. The deceased and another policeman were in the act of apprehending the prisoner, when another bushranger [ John Halloran ] who was in company with him, fired at Hardman, and shot him dead, and then made his escape. Lambert is to be executed this morning. ”
Halloran was later arrested and the Sydney Monitor of 22 May, 1837 carried the following, slightly cryptic, story.
John Halloran, charged with the murder of a mounted policeman.
The Attorney-General stated, that in consequence of a person named Kenny swearing that the prisoner was the man who fired the shot which killed the policeman, he was committed for trial on the 2nd February, but the day before Sessions, from the evidence obtained, it appeared improbable that the prisoner could have fired the shot. Their Honors then directed the case stand over, but ordered that strict enquiry should be made into the circumstances.
At the time of his death the trooper was 27 years of age and was attached to the Bathurst Mounted Police. He is sometimes referred to as Harman or Harding.
